Rating of the effectiveness of the heads of municipalities in the Rostov region to attract investment

Homepage > About the region > Rating of the effectiveness of the heads of municipalities in the Rostov region to attract investment

Evaluation of the municipalities to attract investment in the quarterly mode is in areas characterized by:

- The intensity and dynamics of investment activity in the municipality,

- The intensity and dynamics of contracting activity in the municipality,

- The intensity and dynamics of housing construction in the municipality,

- The impact of the investment processes at the level of employment of municipalities,

- The intensity and dynamics of the resulting primary indicator of economic development of the municipality - trafficking organizations

- The dynamics of the impact of the financial and economic activities of organizations in the territory of the municipality.

The methodology of the ranking otsenki.rar

Rating score for the 1st half of 2012:

	The volume index of investment in fixed assets (Unapproved data)
	2011 in % to 2006	scores
Rostov-on-Don	113.9	1
Azov	297.7	5
Bataysk	159.8	2
Volgodonsk	330.6	5
Gukovo	118.8	1
Donetsk	119.0	1
Zverevo	41.9	0
Kamensk Shakhtinsky	94.5	0
Novocherkassk	254.2	4
Novoshakhtinsk	402.0	5
Taganrog	100.2	1
Mine	98.2	0

maximum	330.6
minimum	100.2
step interval	46.08
	Investment in fixed assets per capita (Excluding data on micro-enterprises and the informal economy)
	January-20 June 12, rubles	scores
Rostov-on-Don	18 057,8	4
Azov	16 691,5	4
Bataysk	7 718,0	2
Volgodonsk	54 401,5	5
Gukovo	4 603,5	1
Donetsk	4 326,2	1
Zverevo	3 325,6	1
Kamensk Shakhtinsky	5 504,8	1
Novocherkassk	22 071,0	5
Novoshakhtinsk	5 095,0	1
Taganrog	9 994,0	2
Mine	5 569,4	1

maximum	22 071,0
minimum	3 325,6
step interval	3 749,08
	The volume index of investment in fixed assets (Excluding data on micro-enterprises and the informal economy)
	January-June 2012 in% to January-June 2011	scores
Rostov-on-Don	109.5	1
Azov	205.7	5
Bataysk	95.4	0
Volgodonsk	201.7	5
Gukovo	123.8	1
Donetsk	99.7	0
Zverevo	108.3	1
Kamensk Shakhtinsky	150, 4	3
Novocherkassk	167.4	4
Novoshakhtinsk	139.9	2
Taganrog	84.1	0
Mine	45.2	0

maximum	205.7
minimum	108.3
step interval	19.48
	Investment in fixed assets per capita levels of investment, excluding the largest organizations (Excluding data on micro-enterprises and the informal economy)
	January-June 2012, rubles	scores
Rostov-on-Don	17 401,9	5
Azov	16 691,5	5
Bataysk	7 688,6	2
Volgodonsk	10 3 04,6	3
Gukovo	4 600,2	1
Donetsk	4 324,7	1
Zverevo	2 090,6	1
Kamensk Shakhtinsky	5 501,5	2
Novocherkassk	20 783,9	5
Novoshakhtinsk	5 092,8	1
Taganrog	9 385,8	3
Mine	5 491,5	2

maximum	17 401,9
minimum	2 090,6
step interval	3 062,26
	The volume index of investment in fixed assets excluding the largest organizations in investments (Excluding data on micro-enterprises and the informal economy)
	January-June, December 20 in% to January-June 2011	scores
Rostov-on-Don	110.4	1
Azov	207.2	5
Bataysk	97.8	0
Volgodonsk	138.9	2
Gukovo	123.7	2
Donetsk	100.8	1
Zverevo	177.7	4
Kamensk Shakhtinsky	150.6	3
Novocherkassk	174.7	4
Novoshakhtinsk	140.3	2
Taganrog	83.9	0
Mine	44.6	0

maximum	207.2
minimum	100.8
step interval	21.28
	The volume index of investment in fixed capital of municipal ownership (For large, medium-sized organizations and organizations with up to 15 people)
	January-June 2012 in% to January-June 2011	scores
Rostov-on-Don	59.6	0
Azov	304.3	5
Bataysk	2887.4	5
Volgodonsk	242.8	4
Gukovo	98.5	0
Donetsk	55.3	0
Zverevo	3332.3	5
Kamensk Shakhtinsky	132.8	1
Novocherkassk	129.7	1
Novoshakhtinsk	114.6	1
Taganrog	286.1	5
Mine	115.9	1

maximum	304.3
minimum	114.6
step interval	37.94
	New housing per 1000 population
	January-June 2012, square. meters the total area of	scores
Rostov-on-Don	310.8	5
Azov	253.3	5
Bataysk	329.8	5
Volgodonsk	160.6	3
Gukovo	73.0	1
Donetsk	141.8	3
Zverevo	19.5	1
Kamensk Shakhtinsky	79.7	2
Novocherkassk	200.8	4
Novoshakhtinsk	48.2	1
Taganrog	193.1	3
Mine	158.8	3

maximum	310.8
minimum	19.5
step interval	58.26
	The dynamics of housing all by municipality
	January-June 2012 in% to January-June 2011	scores

Rostov-on-Don	86.9	0
Azov	124.9	1
Bataysk	127.3	1
Volgodonsk	99.6	0
Gukovo	70.4	0
Donetsk	129.0	1
Zverevo	71.9	0
Kamensk Shakhtinsky	190.2	5
Novocherkassk	194.9	5
Novoshakhtinsk	34.3	0
Taganrog	136.0	1
Mine	96.7	0

maximum	194.9
minimum	124.9
step interval	14.00
	Volume work performed by Business "Construction" per capita
	January-June 2012, rubles	scores

Rostov-on-Don	12 727,6	5
Azov	1 708,2	1
Bataysk	8 393,2	4
Volgodonsk	28 170,2	5
Gukovo	3 338,1	2
Donetsk	1 548,9	1
Zverevo	223.3	1
Kamensk Shakhtinsky	5 255,8	3
Novocherkassk	7 438,9	3
Novoshakhtinsk	1 253,3	1
Taganrog	6 872,6	3
Mine	3 417,9	2

maximum	12 727,6
minimum	223.3
step interval	2 500,86
	Dynamics of the work performed by Business "Construction"
	January-June 2012 in% to January-June 2011	scores

Rostov-on-Don	98.5	0
Azov	164.7	5
Bataysk	65.8	0
Volgodonsk	152.0	5
Gukovo	73.5	0
Donetsk	90.8	0
Zverevo	98.0	0
Kamensk Shakhtinsky	113.7	1
Novocherkassk	68.3	0
Novoshakhtinsk	61.7	0
Taganrog	118.5	2
Mine	101.0	1

maximum	164.7
minimum	101.0
step interval	12.74
	The turnover of the large and medium-sized organizations per capita
	January-June 2012, rubles	scores
Rostov-on-Don	285 993,4	5
Azov	202 713,3	5
Bataysk	77 282,4	2
Volgodonsk	189 955,6	5
Gukovo	149 429,0	4
Donetsk	23 487,0	1
Zverevo	25 686,9	1
Kamensk Shakhtinsky	104 751,7	3
Novocherkassk	156 305,7	4
Novoshakhtinsk	16 193,1	1
Taganrog	172 007,5	5
Mine	82 940,1	2

maximum	202 713,3
minimum	16 193,1
step interval	37 304,04
	Dynamics of turnover large and medium-sized organizations (Comparable to a circle)
	January-June 2012 in% to January-June 2011	scores
Rostov-on-Don	117.6	5
Azov	103.5	1
Bataysk	119.5	5
Volgodonsk	117.2	5
Gukovo	103.4	1
Donetsk	105.2	1
Zverevo	89.2	0
Kamensk Shakhtinsky	112.8	3
Novocherkassk	103.4	1
Novoshakhtinsk	111.1	3
Taganrog	105.1	1
Mine	116.4	5

maximum	119.5
minimum	103.4
step interval	3.22
	Changes in the share of profitable large and medium-sized organizations (On a comparable range of organizations)
	January-June 2012 to January-June 2011, percentage points	reference specific gravity profitable enterprises,%	scores

Rostov-on-Don	-1.4	72.8	0
Azov	11.4	70.5	5
Bataysk	-6.0	66.7	0
Volgodonsk	9.7	77.8	5
Gukovo	5.3	57.9	3
Donetsk	-11.2	44.4	0
Zverevo	-50.0	-	0
Kamensk Shakhtinsky	-3.0	51.5	0
Novocherkassk	4.4	67.4	2
Novoshakhtinsk	0	61.5	1
Taganrog	1.5	62.9	1
Mine	-6.3	70.8	0
Rostov region		70.5

maximum	11.4
minimum	0
step interval	2.28
	Dynamics of nominal gross wages
	June 2012 in% to June 2011	scores

Rostov-on-Don	117.9	4
Azov	116.7	3
Bataysk	113.9	2
Volgodonsk	112.8	2
Gukovo	122.7	5
Donetsk	119.9	4
Zverevo	110.1	1
Kamensk Shakhtinsky	116.9	3
Novocherkassk	120.2	5
Novoshakhtinsk	116.4	3
Taganrog	116.2	3
Mine	111.0	1

maximum	122.7
minimum	110.1
step interval	2.52
	Registered unemployment end of period
	June 2012, in% the economically active population	scores
Rostov-on-Don	0.5	5
Azov	0.8	4
Bataysk	0.7	4
Volgodonsk	0.5	5
Gukovo	1.5	1
Donetsk	1.4	1
Zverevo	1.5	1
Kamensk Shakhtinsky	0.9	3
Novocherkassk	0.4	5
Novoshakhtinsk	1.4	1
Taganrog	0.7	4
Mine	0.8	4

maximum	1.5
minimum	0.4
step interval	0.22

Also annually held in Rostov rating of the effectiveness of the administration of the investment processes by line ministries and administrations of urban districts and municipal districts according sMetodicheskimi recommendations, endorsed the decision of Board of Administration of Rostov region from 13.09.2010 № 96 "On the evaluation of ministries and administrations of urban districts and municipal districts to ensure the effectiveness of investment and innovation. "

Published at: 27.03.2013, 04:00:00

| Updated at: 01.02.2021, 10:12:35